In recent years, the phenomenon of self-diagnosis has become increasingly prevalent across the globe, driven largely by the proliferation of online resources and the growing availability of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. While this trend was initially limited to the medical field, it has now expanded to encompass other areas of expertise, including the legal field.
One factor contributing to the rise of self-diagnosis is the increased accessibility of information through online platforms. The internet offers a wealth of resources on virtually any topic, including medical and legal advice. In many cases, these resources can be valuable tools for people seeking information about their health or legal situation. However, the ease with which information can be accessed online has also led to a growing trend of self-diagnosis, whereby individuals attempt to diagnose their own health or legal issues using online resources.
The advent of AI has further fueled this trend, as chatbots and other AI-powered tools have become increasingly sophisticated and capable of providing advice and guidance on a wide range of topics. ChatGPT, for example, is an AI language model that can answer questions and provide information on a broad range of topics, including legal issues.
While the availability of online resources and AI technologies can be useful for many people, it is important to be aware of the risks and limitations associated with self-diagnosis, particularly in the legal field. Legal issues can be complex and nuanced, and attempting to diagnose or address them without the guidance of a trained professional can lead to serious consequences.
One of the primary risks associated with self-diagnosis in the legal field is the potential for individuals to misinterpret or misapply legal concepts and principles. Legal terminology can be confusing and difficult to navigate, and without a thorough understanding of the relevant laws and regulations, individuals may inadvertently make errors or misinterpret key information. This can have serious implications for their legal situation, potentially leading to fines, penalties, or other legal consequences.
Another risk associated with self-diagnosis in the legal field is the potential for individuals to overlook important factors that may impact their case. Legal issues are often complex and multifaceted, and attempting to diagnose or address them without a comprehensive understanding of the relevant factors can be challenging, if not impossible. For example, individuals may overlook key evidence or fail to consider alternative arguments or strategies that could potentially strengthen their case.
In order to mitigate these risks, it is essential for individuals to be responsible and careful about the limitations of AI and other online resources at the present time. While these tools can be valuable sources of information and guidance, they should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal advice. Instead, individuals should seek out qualified legal professionals who can provide personalized guidance and advice based on their unique circumstances and needs.
A few days back, the teams of PCA HR and Payroll Services received a request from a Client regarding a cap set by a Circular (No. 111/2013/TT-BTC issued by the Ministry of Finance) for the salaries paid in the IT industry. Our Client thought that his employees were eligible to a discount on their paid PIT. He was aware of the limitations of the AI and had carefully checked with us before sharing these information. The reality was different from what the AI had reported. Below the reply from our legal teams:
Pursuant to Resolution No. 41/NQ-CP dated 26/5/2016, IT industry workers shall be reduced 50% of the amount of personal income tax. However, this is only a guideline and currently, there is still no Government’s decision regulating this issue. Thus, the PIT of high-tech workers is still subject to Circular 111/2013/TT-BTC with no exemptions.
In addition, if employees are included in the labor attraction policy in Articles 3 and 10 of Decree No.87/2014 dated 22/09/2014 stipulating the attraction of individuals for scientific and technological activities (mainly in the field of research projects) will enjoy maximum tax incentives (the tax has not specified how the incentives are). So if they are ordinary IT workers who are not recognized by the state and are participating in a research project, the tax will still be charged as usual.
The attractive allowance for this case will not be included in the income from salary or wages for tax calculation according to Point b.5 Clause 2 Article 2 of Circular No.111/2013.
While the phenomenon of self-diagnosis is a global phenomenon, it is important to recognize the potential risks and limitations associated with this trend, particularly in the legal field. By being responsible and careful about the limitations of AI and other online resources, individuals can help ensure that they are able to make informed decisions and take appropriate actions to address their legal needs. Ultimately, the best way to navigate complex legal issues is to seek out the guidance of a qualified legal professional who can provide personalized advice and support.
Contact PCA Company Services today. We will help you info@pcacompanyservices.com
